Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GasTech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 07:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

GasTech
Delete for advertising, and making no claim of meeting WP:CORP. "Customers always come first!" "Onshore, offshore - They do it all!" "For Excellence, Quality, and Experience - GasTech Engineering." This is very transparently spam.

I am also nominating the following related page because it consists of approximately the same content: lowercase 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * GasTech Engineering Corporation Tulsa Oklahoma USA
 * Delete per nom.-- blue 520  17:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Both adspam. This is pretty blatant, as well as being a copyvio. It's pretty much copied from their website. Fan1967 17:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

hi there! First of all, I have to mention that I am new to Wikipedia so would really need some suggestions how to get my article on the list. I have edited the page as suggested. Below the page I have listed their website so I am not sure if I am violating the copyright. Please suggest how can I get this article listed in Wikipedia. Also, I am narrating the website in 3rd person. I am relating the company to Malony Crawford that does not exist any more and was a 100 year old company. Also, I am not associated with the company ..just that being a Tulsa resident wanted to write a lil note about the compoany to get it recognition worldwide. The Company has a few patents on the innovation of process technology that they use to manufacture Heaters. Thanks, -Andy

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/GasTech"


 * Comment If you're copying the content from their site, you are violating the copyright. If you actually feel the company is notable enough to deserve an article (please read WP:CORP for guidelines) you really need to pretty much wipe out the whole thing and write a new one from scratch. This article basically reads like an ad, and that is emphatically not what Wikipedia is for. Fan1967 19:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.