Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaskispor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Gaskispor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. I couldn't find any sources, but perhaps people that speak Turkish could find something from its 27 year existence.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 09:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  Anarchyte  ( talk  &#8226;  work ) 09:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Anarchyte  ( talk  &#8226;  work ) 09:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Anarchyte  ( talk  &#8226;  work ) 09:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - this confirms existence and that club played in the third division of Turkish football. Other sources exist to verify, such as this and this. I am aware that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but we have articles about most of the other Second League clubs, so I presume playing at that level confers notability. Those sources are from page 1 or 2 of a standard quick google search for "Gaskispor" so I am concerned nominator has not complied with WP:BEFORE. Article needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 10:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I looked at more than just the first two pages of google and all websites had no information, just the name of the club and their members. That's why we're at AfD and not PROD so that I could make sure I wasn't missing anything, which it seems I was. I'll leave this open for a bit but I wouldn't be opposed to withdrawing it if it continues this way.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 12:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, albeit not with flying colors in its current state; the team also contested the 2006–07 Turkish Cup and national cup play is a common standard for inclusion for clubs. Geschichte (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, the absolute most I've been able to find is this article that states that's it's a sort of feeder club (?). Everything else is just routine coverage. Nehme<b style="font-family:Verdana;color:#27B382">1499</b> 13:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:FOOTYN presumed notability because of competing in the national cup Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets FOOTYN as per above.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:FOOTYN. Sonofstar (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:FOOTYN as stated above.Ahmetlii (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.