Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gasser v Stinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- VS talk 07:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Gasser v Stinson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no claim of notability since March 2007. Other than that, I'm neutral Montchav (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep valid stub. Catchpole (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: this editor added identical keep votes without meaningful rationale to a large number of AfDs. Jfire (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:V as an unreported case, no citations, possibly WP:OR. Bearian (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * In the US an unreported case is expressly intended by the courts to not be cited and therefore to be unlikely to be notable. I don't know what the Canadian courts' intend with unreported cases, though. --Lquilter (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.