Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaston Lagman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Gaston Lagman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted by PROD back in July 2008; nothing has changed, this player remains non-notable and fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Govvy (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – no indication of notability. C 679 18:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, or received significant coverage in reliable source - failing both WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.