Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatch gereftani

Gatch gereftani was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Some horrible method of execution. I am hoping this is not real. No google hits. Thue | talk 21:45, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * This has got to be the delusion of a warped mind. Delete as nonsense. - Lucky 6.9 22:01, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Unless corroborated delete, or move to List of sanctions to be applied against worthless vanity page producers. Ianb 22:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * It could be real, but the article itself sounds wishy-washy on the fact claim. A real article on the subject would be bold and referenced.  Delete, unless evidence is offered. Geogre 01:13, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Sounds suspicious. Exploding Boy 02:56, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * If it's real (and I have no idea whether this is the case), keep and put it in Category:Death penalty, just like Crushing by elephant. But it needs reworking if we choose to keep it; the level of detail the article goes into is as morbid as it is unencyclopedic.  --Ardonik 04:22, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * A bit of Googling around for the individual words suggests a loose translation of "Plaster (Gatch) to take (gereftan)", which seems to fit the content. So if it's a hoax, someone has gone to some effort to make up a plausible name. Are there any Iranian Wikipedians who could check this? -- The Anome 08:57, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I believe this is a hoax and have documented my reasons on the talkpage. Delete unless authoritatively confirmed. Rossami 13:29, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * After reading Rosammi's comments, I vote to delete. --Ardonik 21:42, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * After reading Rosammi's comments, I also vote to delete. -- The Anome 09:09, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete, absolutely. Fire Star 13:47, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I echo Rossami's statements about the properties of cement. Delete probable nonsense. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:11, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)