Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gate.io


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  02:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Gate.io

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Orphan article. Over 50 references, but how many of those actually constitute significant coverage in reliable sources? I'm not sure I've seen enough here to be convinced this passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. A WP:REFBOMB of press release churnalism. If anyone is impressed by these sources, please list the three most convincing for WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I didn't have time to review all sources, but every one that I did check was an obvious laundered press release, i.e. churnalism. Nothing independent of the source and frankly nothing that wasn't WP:MILL, just routine notices of a company doing company stuff.  Nothing notable to see here. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.