Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gate Petroleum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Girth Summit  (blether) 17:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Gate Petroleum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article looks promotional in return of undisclosed payments and violates the Wikipedia terms of use. Rodney Araujo Tell me - My contributions  16:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Comment The issue of undisclosed payments looks to be based on two edits from last month . This is applying TNT to something that easily can be cleaned up if there's promotional language. – The Grid  ( talk )  21:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I just reviewed it and I don't think the main issue is promotional language, the subject seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I see. The AfD was brought up originally because of COI and looking at the history - those edits were reverted. – The Grid  ( talk )  12:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 00:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost 40 sources, but only 4 mention the company in heading and all read like press-release-like coverage of routine business operaitons. My BEFORE failed to find anything resembling independent, in-depth coverage. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- this is plainly an advertising brochure and, despite attempts at ref-bombing the significant coverage just doesn't seem to be there. Reyk YO! 10:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.