Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gate intercom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Intercom. Randykitty (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Gate intercom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The same content is provided in the page Intercom, many of the categories are present there wired,two-way etc. Adding a "uses" section to the Intercom page and putting in this page's intro there should be enough in my opinion Daiyusha (talk) 07:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As one vote is not justified at all, and a degree of uncertainty otherwise
 * Comment I was wondering if a redirect to Intercom page is needed or not. I might of suggested merge a bit of content, but the lack of sourcing doesn't help that either. Govvy (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect Trillfendi (talk) 05:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Intercom as this seems a plausible search term. As a note, Intercom currently contains no references at all and doesn't mention the word "gate"; that page clearly needs improvement.  Delete first because this seems like a possible copyvio/linkspam promo of the one source in the article. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 01:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Μerge whatever is assessed as having encyclopaedic value and can be attributed to sources onto the "Intercom" article. The whole text, however, of the contested article currently stands without any sources, as pure WP:OR. If it remains so, we can only delete it. -The Gnome (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.