Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateshead F.C. season 2006–07


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Gateshead F.C. season 2006–07

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article detailing a season for a club playing in regional league, which I do not believe is article-worthy, and precedents have been set here and here. I am also nominating: for the same reason. Note that I have not nominated Gateshead F.C. season 2009–10, a season in which the club will play in a national league, as I believe this needs further discussion before a separate AfD. пﮟოьεԻ  5  7  21:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gateshead F.C. season 2005–06
 * Gateshead F.C. season 2004–05
 * Gateshead F.C. season 2007–08
 * Gateshead F.C. season 2008–09
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  21:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. – PeeJay 21:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * delete all per nominator after summarising anything noteworthy enough for the main article there. Thryduulf (talk) 01:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all - it has become accepted practice to have season articles on teams that play in a national league as Gateshead will have from August (and it is plainly irrational to delete the pages and recreate them in due course). The fact that the seasons were on a club in their non-national league period is not relevant; see Thames Ironworks F.C. season 1895–96 and Black Arabs F.C. season 1883–84 for example. I see no policy or consensus reason to delete these articles. TerriersFan (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. GiantSnowman 10:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all they appear to be as well referenced as other articles for clubs playing at a higher level. Status of the club should not be the defining factor; Verifiability and Notability should be, and those are defined in policy. - fchd (talk) 12:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all - If pages such as Newton Heath L&YR F.C. season 1883–84 and several seasons following are acceptable because the current team play in a national league, even though at the time they weren't in any league, these season articles should not be deleted. - Jcarls1 (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As the major contributor to the articles you mention, I ought to say that I'm actually considering nominating them for deletion for precisely the same reason as this article. However, I think that should be postponed until after this AfD is closed. – PeeJay 20:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.