Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Fire Department


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. See Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services.  Majorly   (hot!)  21:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Gatlinburg Fire Department

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
 * Bristol Tennessee Police Department
 * Cut Bank Police Department
 * Gallatin County Sheriff's Office
 * Gatlinburg Public Services
 * Kingsport Police Department
 * Pigeon Forge Public Services
 * Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
 * Roanoke County Sheriff's Office
 * Sevier County Sheriff's Office
 * Sullivan County Tennessee Sheriff's Office

Nom - fails notability entirely. See also WP:NOT. }} Rklawton 18:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gatlinburg, Tennessee where this is already covered. Public services in a town might well be of interest to people reading about the town, but it is too local in scope to justify a separate article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge all into parent articles, per my comments on the first listing of the group, and per views expressed at (historical) proposed guideline WP:LOCAL. Edison 17:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * KeepThe author of this article is my adoptee. I have previously saved an article written by my adoptee from deletion by rewritting it.  I didn't want to do this too much because I wanted my adoptee to have freedom to decide what to write.  I have concrete ideas to improve this particular article.  Furthermore, I have significantly beefed up articles (originally written by someone else, not me) saving them from deletion.  This includes Tiger Airways Australia, Nitrium, and a small police department article.  Of the 11 articles listed, I think this one has the most potential (though the author may disagree).  Please kindly allow me to work on this article next week (this week: too busy).  You can retag it for deletion in 3-4 weeks if you don't like it.VK35  18:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - the only point of relevance I see to your observations above is that this article has "potential". Could you explain that potential?  Rklawton 19:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * plan to add stuff on history and how the department is different (and notable) from other small town fire departments. Furthermore, I'll do a search to find out if there's any more useful information to add.  Even in the article's present form, it's better written than this article, which hasn't been tagged for deletion [] or [] or []VK35  22:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.