Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaudapada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Gaudapada

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not link or cite any references. It was marked as such in December 2006 and nobody had a look at it since 2006. MBest-son (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of references you can add at Google Books: . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald Eugene Ivens (talk • contribs) 23:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and get an expert in Hinduism to have a look at it. Also post a notice on WP:Wikiproject Religion. Itsmejudith (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Adi Shankara has been described as the Hindu equivalent of Aquinas, Meister Eckhart and Augustine combined. Surely his guru deserves an article. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 15:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Firstly this has cited a reference since 12 April and two editors have made substantial edits since this was tagged as unreferenced in 2006, so the nomination is factually incorrect on two counts. Secondly I think this must be the first time this is one of the few times (I just remembered International PEN and the Garrick Club) I've seen an article up for AfD on a subject that gets over 1000 hits at Google books. How much more notable can you get? Phil Bridger (talk) 09:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Goethean. I wonder why this same under is on an AFD spree on Hindu religious leader articles?  Baka man ' 02:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.