Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaudencio Hernández Burgos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Gaudencio Hernández Burgos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable politician. He exists, but no coverage in secondary sources. Just to give you an idea of how little coverage there is, I searched him on Google News. There were 0 results. I didn't see one result at all. Google Scholar just gives voting records. 123chess456 (talk) 02:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Members of national Congresses and Parliaments pass WP:POLITICIAN. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, his status as Member of Parliament is easily verifiable. "Gaudencio Hernández" gets 10,200 google hits, and all the top results refer to him in his political role. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. --Soman (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Members of a national legislature are always notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia per WP:POLITICIAN — and I hope that in future, the nominator will keep in mind that Google News only aggregates news hits from within the couple of weeks immediately preceding the day you're searching on, with older coverage phasing out of being locatable that way. So it can be a helpful test for determining whether a person whose notability claim is fresh (e.g. "just won an election that took place yesterday") is real or a hoax, but it's rarely an infallible gauge of notability by itself if you don't also search general Web and/or Books. Bearcat (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per all the arguments above. G S Palmer (talk) 16:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously meets the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.