Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Gaikwad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Gaurav Gaikwad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted page of someone who doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG and which is blatantly promotional. Templates visible at the time aside, this does not appear to be created thru AfC. Review of the links show the same press releases from his agency spammed to multiple sources. JamesG5 (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Please help me for undeletion page, gaurav Gaikwad.

Amolshinde143 (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite the multiple cites, these are almost all spammed press-released and some sources of, at best, extremely questionable reliability. No evidence of actually passing GNG. Hugsyrup 08:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing substantial to support WP:GNG. A Google search returns with few PR and spam articles. Not notable to have a page. The9Man  &#124; (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 16:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet another article in the spate of fake news blackhat SEO sites trying to inflate the importance of their clients. Not a single one of these sources are reliable. Praxidicae (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * delete I agree with Praxidicae. I couldnt find any reliable source mentioning he subject. All are PRs. Just for example this rajsthan times, and this asianage article are PR. Subject lacks notability. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The articles fails in our notability criteria.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is only one sentence long and does nothing to demonstrate the subject's notability.TH1980 (talk) 05:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.