Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam Garry Guptaa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 23:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Gautam Garry Guptaa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although there are a couple of reputable sources here I don't think that either of them are really sufficient to establish notability: they may mention the man but they are not substantially about him. TheLongTone (talk) 12:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete promo advert, sources are a few trivial mentions, others are own website and advertising his business, fails WP:GNG Kraxler (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Barely any different than the version I speedied. Even if the article subject is shown to be notable - the Hindustan Times source is the closest he comes to an independent, non-passing mention, and I can't find anything better with an (admittedly cursory and unenthusiastic) search - this version of the article should be deleted anyway due to the promotionalism. —Cryptic 20:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.