Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautam Kanodia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. WP:SNOW. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Gautam Kanodia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Presented sources are mere routine coverage or directory listings. Google searches do not emit anything significant. Hitro talk 09:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India,  and Uttar Pradesh. Hitro talk 09:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * We Can also Fix the error and add new notable links in the article. Sudhakarmishrain (talk) 12:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Hitro, there are no reliable independent sources that have significant coverage of the subject. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * notable
 * hey, I know this Article is small but we can use Stub performed a search and find some reliable sources eg,
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/the-future-of-cement-manufacturing-ai-automation/
 * https://www.aninews.in/news/business/business/kanodia-group-forays-into-the-hygiene-segment-with-the-launch-of-hygiene-plus20220426182847/
 * SM7081 (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ this article need citations needed SM7081 (talk) 16:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Why Citation ? Needed Sorufx1 (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete fails ANYBIO and GNG as stated above. No significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and the sources in the article do not satisfy notability guidelines. The links above don't satisfy them either. Tails   Wx  18:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage. Also, the two sources presented by the likely connected SPA accounts above are unreliable as the first falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and the second was written by the subject of this page so not independent. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Checkuser note In a completely unsurprising turn of events, the article creator and two of the accounts commenting here ( and ) are all ✅ to each other.-- Ponyo bons mots 23:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm so shocked... - UtherSRG (talk) 00:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly unsurprised lol --CNMall41 (talk) 01:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed, no significant coverage and all of the 11 references are promotional and therefore do not say so. Just spamming a bunch of sources does not mean any person is notable enough. HarukaAmaranth  春香 01:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hygiene Plus! Thanks for the laff. MisterWizzy (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Lacks significant coverage. For now it fails WP:GNG. B-Factor (talk) 05:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:ANYBIO. Dcotos  ( talk ) 10:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nom.  Ratnahastin  (talk) 14:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.