Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Osborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 23:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Gavin Osborn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An English singer/songwriter who does not meet the criteria for an article in the encyclopedia per WP:MUSIC. Previously deleted after being prodded. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient mention in reliable sources, he has received a few mentions for his tour with Daniel Kitson (eg. 1,2,3) but they are all trivial and contain essential no biographical information. His record label is Gravity DIP Records which appears to be a not insignificant indie label and thus might meet WP:MUSIC criterion #6, but I find the lack of RS and, failure to meet the WP:GNG by any measure, to overwhelm that. Also, this means very little as it is pretty subjective, but judging by his myspace comments he does not have a very large fan base. - Icewedge (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. Salt it this time. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The first deletion was via the proposed deletion process which is considered non-binding and can be overturned by any user, so CSD G4 does not apply. - Icewedge (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Undead Warrior (talk) 02:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable sub-stup, per Icewedge's comment.  abf  /talk to me/  19:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.