Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gawkalitis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Several reasons... Tone 15:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Gawkalitis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about an obscure and possibly falling under WP:madeup word, which as of now is not even mentioned in the article. Instead the article includes copy-pasted definitions of words like "gawk" from dictionaries. Antipastor (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment from nominator: prod was refused by the editor who created the article (but without comment). There are basically very few ghits on the term, and I would tend to propose speedy deletion, as there is no content besides copying from dictionaries. Antipastor (talk) 09:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete no google news, books ,or scholar hits, blatent hoax UltraMagnusspeak 10:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Burn with fire: WP:MADEUP. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 13:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet another word coined by a bored teen. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.