Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gawkbox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Gawkbox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references point to a press release (or perhaps routine coverage), an unreliable source, and a passing mention. Seems to fall far short of corporate notability requirements. A preliminary WP:BEFORE only uncovered more press releases. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  17:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 20:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 20:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - There's coverage, but it is all routine announcements mostly related to funding. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - too soon, too little content, too few refs. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 01:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources provided are Not independent. Fails WP:RS and WP:CORPDEPTH.  CASSIOPEIA(talk</b>) 14:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.