Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gawler Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Gawler Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Primary schools are not ordinarily notable, and there are no substantial independent sources to show that this is an exception. It is located in a heritage area, and that area would justify an article in which this could be mentioned  DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. As noted, primary schools are not normally considered notable. I can't see anything special here. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that there is not much recently on google, but notability is not transient. In this case:
 * I suggest that there will be sufficient here to write something in-depth.
 * It is the feature of a book.
 * Importantly it is also a separately State listed in its own right heritage property.
 * Normally I would agree that an ordinary school is not notable, but it is not in this case. Aoziwe (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NGEO as a heritage listed property, agree with nominator that, in addition to this article, an article on the heritage area would be useful ie. Gawler Church Hill State Heritage Area. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it has been established to be a recognized historic site. Even if it were just a non-notable primary school, it could/should be mentioned in a school district article, and redirect/merge would be preferable to outright deletion.  The usual outcome for primary school AFDs is redirect. --Doncram (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing the AfD. I had thought only the overall property was listed, but I now see that the school is also. I would not have nominated it had I realized that.  DGG''' ( talk ) 22:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.