Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gawr Gura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. any editor in good standing is welcome to bring this for discussion if needed. Not rewarding socks/adding to the backlog of AfDs with a relist Star   Mississippi  01:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Gawr Gura

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Gaetr (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Gaetr (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Internet and Websites.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment We've got one article on Project Melody, which is about the same idea/concept. It at lease has sourcing from Vice and a few other sites, this article seems to have not as high-level sources. Oaktree b (talk) 20:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Weak Delete Comment From what I've seen so far, most of the sources on the subject are minor publications covering trivial topics, such as a new avatar, funny moment, etc. I can't really blame them, because the thing is this subject appears to be a persona rather than an actual person. This might introduce some WP:FAN and WP:UNIVERSE style information to the article. It would be best that the article be in the style of a fictional character rather than a biography though. Sparkl (talk) 21:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies WP:NWEB. --Hi I am just wondering what the Russians (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC) — Hi I am just wondering what the Russians (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Blocked as a sock. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 23:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Either Keep because it passes WP:NWEB or redirect to Hololive Production. But I'm leaning towards keep.  Hansen Sebastian Talk 16:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. As there are other !votes that contemplate not keeping the page, I won't speedy-close this. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 00:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: There are already a dozen V-Tuber pages on Wikipedia, and stated by the listed sources which include Wired and Crunchyroll among others, she's quite possibly the most popular/well known of them all. Don't see how she could not pass WP:N, there are tons more sources out there then the 24 shown, with 13.4 Million hits from a google search alone. Nomination by a sock is the only reason this page made it to AfD. Chaddude (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:GOOGLEHITS. Can you provide those sources? – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 23:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.