Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay.co.nz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  04:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Gay.co.nz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No demonstrated notability. In a web search and investigation of available newspapers, only two potential sources were found: a survey output which did not discuss the website, but did include it in a list of websites when asking gay men about their use of various websites (PDF), and a guide book with only the line “Provides travel information aimed at gay, lesbian and bisexual visitors, and vets businesses for standards of service and hospitality.” (see in book search: ). Personally, I do not see this as sufficient to meet “significant coverage”. For comparison, a similar site, gaynz.com, did at some point at least gain coverage in NZ media: — HTGS (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Sexuality and gender,  and Websites. — HTGS (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Traumnovelle (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.