Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GayPark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

GayPark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable mobile application. The article's only sources are application links, the application itself has not received any coverage (a search of Google News returns no results). Also noteworthy is the similarity between the account that created this iteration, and the account that created the previous iteration of the article, prior to its deletion: User:GP.Jimmy and User:GayPark.Jimmy; the connection between these accounts, as pointed out here by, seems to involve COI and promotional intent.  g s k  08:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence (or credible assertion of) notability, and pushing the edge of G11 to boot. Pinkbeast (talk) 09:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Neutral - awaiting the page creators response for request for reliable sources. Looking at similar products to this one it's pretty much what I expect. It may be too soon for an article until more reviews are in. Sportfan5000 (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I failed to find coverage of this, so this is a product not yet ready for an article. Clarification - by pointing out the existence of the two user accounts, I was not intending to suggest that there was any improper use of two accounts, no WP:SOCKing or such. Assuming they are the same user, there was understandable reason for generating a new account name, as the user had received not-entirely-correct criticism for his previous name as being promotional. I pointed it out merely to show that the article had a history (with apparently the same creator) beyond what is in the current history file (as visible to us non-admins). --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Current refs do not constitute significant coverage in reliable sources, as they are commercial/download links. A search revealed no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.