Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay Fuel (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep.  Syn  ergy 00:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Gay Fuel
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable product. The only coverage seems to have been a few small articles about some people getting upset over the name, but it was by no means widespread, and the drink itself doesn't appear to be notable. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 02:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, a consumer product noticed by reliable sources, seems to meet the business and general product notability guidelines. I thought they ran on diesel, myself. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep subject of sufficient independent coverage. Of plausible interest to readership. Wily D  14:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 01:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nothing wrong with this article, has photo, label, sources.  It's entries like this that separate us from Britannica.  Wasted Time R (talk) 02:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.