Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay fathers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy redirect, as a quite plausible search term, and as per original nomination: "this page should just be a redirect to that one". That doesn't require an AFD tag. --CharlotteWebb 14:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Gay fathers
It just isn't notable at all. There's already a page on Gay parenting, which itself could use a major overhaul. This page should just be a redirect to that one.
 * Redirect per nom. I would say merge, but the content is pretty low-quality. It looks like the original author intended something of a list of gay fathers, but failed to achieve even that. --Ginkgo100 talk · contribs · e@ 20:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Gay parenting (there's a little bit of info in here that could be saved) and redirect. - Yomangani talk 21:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- Gaycruft 205.157.110.11 23:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to gay parenting. Nothing is really salvagable here; the article is written in a very unencyclopedic tone, and there's not much there to begin with. -Elmer Clark 12:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect —  to gay parenting. JChap2007 17:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to gay parenting. It's not really an article, and like Elmer Clark stated above, there's not much that you can write about this. -- Nish kid 64 18:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is plenty that you can write about it. But, at the moment, the article doesn't say any of those those things. DanB DanD 19:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.