Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay naturism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep as no consensus. What is up with all the bold text?(!) El_C 09:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Gay naturism
Listing here since prod tag was removed. Originally prodded as original research and unencyclopedic. cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was original prodder.  -- Merope 20:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete This is nonsense. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 20:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Has 12 references and could be revised. There are certainly many worse articles in Wikipedia -THB 20:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the article is poorly written, but the underlying content is notable. There are historically tensions within the naturist movement that are more or less explicated here. Jdclevenger 23:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Atrociously written and filled with POV/OR, but the subject itself is notable enough an offshoot of the Naturism world. Googling "Gay naturist": 51,700 hits. "Gay nudist": 238,000 hits. wikipediatrix 00:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless this is somehow more than the sum of its parts. Otherwise I think it can be adequately covered by a section in naturism. Damn that WP:POINT preventing me from similarly forking BDSM!--♥ «Charles A. L.» 18:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as it appears to be salvageable. It reads like a copyvio but Google fails to find a doppelganger. Tagging for cleanup. --Dhartung | Talk 00:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as the article appears to have revised significantly, with many subjective references removed. -- lucas_st_paul 13:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: this editor's only edits have been to this AfD discussion. --StuffOfInterest 18:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Wikipediatrix. Carlossuarez46 20:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.