Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayane (given name)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus seems to suggest that the topic is sufficiently notable for inclusion. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Gayane (given name)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Don't see the need for this page. It isn't a disam page, it has very little history on the name, and in general in unremarkable.  Patchy1 Talk To Me! 06:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is notable because the name is among the top 10 most popular names given to girls in Armenia at present. The article can be expanded. You don't delete a stub article, you expand upon it. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep this article, but rename to something more standard. Having articles about the church and the ballet, but not the name is slightly weird.  It will always be a tiny article.  That's fine.  NotAnIP83:149:66:11 (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The current article name is standard for articles about given names. They are all called Name (given name) or Name (name). In this case, given name is appropriate to distinguish it from the church and the ballet. There should probably also be a separate article about the saint if someone comes along to write one who knows more about the topic. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was hasty about names - Martin_(name), or John_(first_name), or Luke. NotAnIP83:149:66:11 (talk) 19:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, unremarkable and unnecessary page. JBsupreme (talk) 18:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep as an article that needs expanded and cleaned up a bit, but is notable. --Bsay USD  CSU [ π ]  00:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep this is very standard for WP. JJL (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.