Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaydachuk Sergiy Anatoliyovych


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Gaydachuk Sergiy Anatoliyovych

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no clear evidence of notability. Based on Google translation of the references, there are no substantial sources, just various publicity and press releases. A considerable part of the article seems to be taken directly from the English translation of ref. 13.  DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

The article really needs some improvements and in some sentences it lacks of grammar accuracy. Nevertheless, the person described in the article is quite significant and famous in business and civic sphere in Ukraine and Europe. That’s why it’s notability, to my mind, shouldn’t be questioned. For example, the pages about Vasyl Stolyar or Leonid Komskyi have no more notability than the discussed article, but they are published on Wikipedia.  Kacyblackmo ( talk ) 08:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Stolyar is president of FC Volyn Lutsk, and that's probably enough for notability, considering the intense coverage WP (rightly or wrongly) gives to football ; Komsky is more doubtful. There are tens of thousands of bios in WP accepted when standards were lower that ought to be removed; it will take years to get them all, butthe least we can do is not add to them.   DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

The article is significant enough though it lacks source like forbes.com or bloomberg.com I've also made some edits and improved grammar mistakes.Bodiadub (talk) 12:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy Delete A search brings out nothing. Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. Lapablo (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. --Tataral (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.