Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayle Kirschenbaum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I entertained 's suggestion to draftify this as WP:TOOSOON, but the article has been around for ten years. That's a long time to wait for something to become notable. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Gayle Kirschenbaum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unambiguous advertising and not salvageable in its current form. Should have been speedied years ago. She has made one film that is potentially notable, but the subject herself fails WP:CREATIVE. One film does not a body of work make, Coretheapple (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:11, 29 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve The article is badly written in an amateur way but multiple sources exist to show notability such as Variety, NYT, Newsday (not letting me access from Europe) and Times of Israel. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw those, they're all on the film. The film may be notable, but not Ms. Kirschenbaum or her mother for that matter. The existence of the film does not give rise to the need to turn a page of Wikipedia into a fansite or resume. She does not have a significant body of work and one film does not satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Coretheapple (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, I think the film is most likely notable but notability is not inherited. Seraphim System ( talk ) 15:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify this for later, in order to either merge it into a notable film of his, or create an independent article altogether. As of yet, and I mean per sources, WP:TOOSOON. -The Gnome (talk) 09:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Seraphim System. Perhaps it is WP:TOOSOON as the reliable, independent references do not focus on the subject but the current project. Ifnord (talk) 13:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.