Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gays.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 15:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Gays.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable website Weisr123 (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete comes across as advertising and has no notoriety.  Lympathy    Talk  15:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment – I've added one source, an article about it in the Boston Herald. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 16:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - links are not the problem with this article. It's the substance of the subject and relevance to an Encyclopedia. The site is not notable, for anything significant having no references that add to the article's substance other than its financial value and it is written as purely subjective and therefor has no reason to remain here in it's current state.  Lympathy    Talk  17:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite sure what you mean by "the site is not notable for anything significant"... The way we decide, in a neutral way, if a subject is sufficiently notable for inclusion in the encyclopedia is "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 17:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair criticism and poor choice of sentence from myself. Reworded accordingly.  Lympathy    Talk  16:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- What an unnecessary article! Who would even search this up??--EZ1234 (talk) 07:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article appears to meet the notability guidelnes, WP:WEB and WP:N through enough significant coverage in reliable sources. Davewild (talk) 18:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.