Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazeebow Unit (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Split and/or duplicated discussions are harmful. Please contribute at Deletion_review. - brenneman (t) (c)  12:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Gazeebow Unit
This article was nominated before. It's been listed on Deletion review. This Newfoundland rap group has attracted national interest and appeared on a flagship arts program of Canadian national radio, This fact was noted by the person voting keep on the original AfD but seems to have been disregarded, which in my opinion was probably an error.

I think it may well be a good idea to arrive at a consensus on this. I'll note that, while I'm unsure about how Wikpiedians will react to this kind of content, I think it may well be worthy of an article. Since there are some people who seem to want it to be deleted without a proper discussion in this forum, I thought I'd like to make sure that it gets a chance, --Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Previous nomination


 * Keep seems notable enough due to the description and they are real. There are bands and groups out there that don't release records or albums and exists only on radio stations, but if it they are a regular then I think it is indeed notable. Just because most of the world cannot hear their stuff doesn't mean they don't deserve a listing. Ben W Bell 11:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll go keep as they have received attention (WP:MUSIC) haz (user talk) 11:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. The undeletion was completely out of process when the DRV debate is near unanimous to "keep deleted". Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy per Sjakkalle. Besides that, this group easily fails WP:MUSIC, and the article tellingly reveals "....having released no records and having no website...".  One mention on radio is simply not enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.