Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazelle (DC Comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of DC Comics characters. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Gazelle (DC Comics)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I think really this needs to be merged to List of DC Comics characters. There doesn't seem to be significant coverage of the subject itself. Jay Σεβαστός discuss  08:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is deleted, a better redirect target would probably be List of Legion of Super-Heroes members. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I disagree with deleting this article. Every other member of the Legion of Superheroes has a wikipedia article devoted to them. Why not Gazelle?  This article has good references.  Also, the other comics character named Gazelle (Marvel Comics) has a much smaller article and it has never been deleted.  Also, Gazelle has only appeared in eight issues so far, so there is not a huge amount of information to cover yet.  As she continues to appear in comics more information will be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doughnut42 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * For information, Gazelle (Marvel Comics) is now a redirect to Salem's Seven.--Crazy runner (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because other superheroes have articles does not mean this one can. Maybe we should delete the other articles as well? This article shows no indication that the character has has enough reliable non-primary significant coverage to get an article on Wikipedia. Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 17:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 17:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Merge per what I said above. Full-out deletion is not really necessary. Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.