Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazillabyte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily Deleted by Anthony Appleyard. Non-Admin close. --Onorem♠Dil 11:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Gazillabyte

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable neologism. Google search returns 7 unique results. Contested Prod. --Onorem♠Dil 00:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Concur with nominator, but also a contested speedy.  I don't think it qualifies as a speedy, though.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable web content. At best it belongs in wikitionary.  Burzmali 01:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Moonriddengirl 01:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., and WP:NOT. Could be transwikied however to the Wiktionary. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 01:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Smashville 01:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Oysterguitarist 02:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, WP:N, and CSD A1 (Little or no context) could apply here as well.  J- stan  Talk Contribs 03:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could be speedy on no-context, but definitely fails WP:NEO. Realkyhick 05:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Mbisanz 06:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.