Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazpromavia Flight 9608


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. AfD has been completely tainted by sockpuppetry and there are no delete votes‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Ponyo bons mots 18:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Gazpromavia Flight 9608

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable, run of the mill accident and no continued coverage. Also barely any news coverage online. SehbasC (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. SehbasC (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominating this for deletion within hours of this breaking out seems too ludicrous. Borgenland (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh c'mon, this accident clearly isn't notable. We had an article similar to this a few months ago and it got deleted. And Rosbif73 nomimates everything for deletion every article he sees. 2605:8D80:400:9392:88B5:190D:C2DE:8990 (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC) strike sock--  Ponyo bons mots 17:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * That you downplay a major hull loss with loss of life and make utterly ridiculous comparisons with incidents of less gravity on another talk page is further proof of how ludicrous this IP’s argument already is, which consists of nothing more than WP:BLUDGEON, WP:BATTLEGROUND and POV pushing as seen by your uncivil comment further down this discussion. Borgenland (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * With that logic, we should have an article for every plane that consisted with a fatality. Alaska air fuel crash that occured a few months ago occured with only a few deaths aswell and was instantly deleted. 2605:8D80:400:9392:F5B0:2D40:2DEC:EBB8 (talk) 17:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC) strike sock--  Ponyo bons mots 17:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * DailyMailUK is literally banned from Wikipedia. A source mentioned by GalaxyBits 2605:8D80:400:9392:F5B0:2D40:2DEC:EBB8 (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC) strike sock--  Ponyo bons mots 17:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep As mentioned above, please make note of WP:RAPID and since this is a commercial airliner crash with fatalities and a net hull-loss, all adds up to keeping this article per WP:AIRCRASH. Also, what exactly do you mean by "no continued coverage"? As I write this, the accident occurred only hours ago, how is sustained coverage even supposed to be determined here? GalacticOrbits (talk) 16:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, the "barely any news coverage online" is factually untrue:, , , and so on. GalacticOrbits (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Those sources are reliable meaning they look like they were made by my dog. 2605:8D80:400:9392:855B:DB8E:9387:1805 (talk) 17:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC) strike sock--  Ponyo bons mots 17:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment For anyone who wants other sources here is the russian version of this arcticle https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B0_SSJ_100_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9#cite_note-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SignorPignolini (talk • contribs) 17:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.