Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gb-gram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — GorillaWarfare talk 18:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Gb-gram

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable product. No sources. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is unreferenced product description. I couldn't find any sources in Google News archives or Google Books that weren't technical manuals or press releases. Steven Walling  08:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination. Anotherclown (talk) 09:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: unverified/unreferenced advertisement.  bahamut0013  words deeds 17:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost speedyable under A3, isn't it? "This is X which is Y" and no further content, non-notable product. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.