Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeForce 11 series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, deletion carried out by RHaworth with edit summary: "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G6, G7. Rationale: AfD has reached 'delete' consensus, author requested deletion in AfD". Cautilus (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

GeForce_11_series
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete A very large proportion of the information in this article is unverified. Some of the most important pieces of information are based on unreliable sources:


 * Turing as the name of the architecture. It could be Volta, Ampere, or something else entirely. NVIDIA has not formally announced any name, and only unverified rumors have suggested Turing or Ampere.
 * The naming scheme being the "GeForce 11 series". There has been no official confirmation from NVIDIA that this is the case, it could be the "20 series" or something else entirely.
 * The statement: "[The GeForce 11 series was] initially expected to launch in the first half of 2018, it has been delayed until H2 2018." has no citations, and there is no verifiable evidence from NVIDIA to support this claim.
 * The release date of July 2018. To quote the article that is cited as evidence for this statement, "...believe that the GeForce GTX 11-series will be launching in July!". Wikipedia is not about what people "believe" or "expect" to be the case, it is for verified & reliable information.
 * The GPU codename, GT104 is similarly based on rumor.
 * The statement: "...While these sources, such as WccfTech, have proven remarkably accurate in the past" is incorrect. Wccftech is not a reliable source, they are a rumor mill website. In fact, most of the information in this article is either from Wccftech or other publications citing Wccftech, which is not reliable.
 * To provide some evidence for the fact that Wccftech is not a reliable source, here are some other articles that wccftech have published that contain either partially or wholly false information: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and there are countless more examples.


 * The specifications for the GTX 1170 & 1180 are entirely speculative and the cited source is not reliable.

As the information above is a large majority of the information contained in this article, I believe this article should be deleted as it does not meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and it breaches Wikipedia's policy about not being a "collection of speculative information". Cautilus (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * i agree with most statements here. The one thing verified was the series naming "11" it was verified by an Nvidia rep saying that the name would be 11 series however the second half would be different. no Ti etc. I can't cite a source but I remember reading it the day of. I also agree to deleting the page its full of nonsense. Matthew Smith (talk) 15:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Move to draft for the article to be worked on. It would not be sensible to delete all this, it will just need continued editing. Thincat (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Agreed moving to draft is a better idea, I created it anticipating more reliable information coming up how ever the release is not expected as soon as previously thought in a recent talk by Jensen of nVidia whom stated the release was not for a long time. Moving to draft we can compile the reliable sources and publish the page when appropriate. quickstream2003 (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete (let an editor move it to their sandbox) - there is nothing supported by RS here. Dbsseven (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete GTX 11 wont be coming out for an long long time. Plus, absolutely nothing on that page is confirmed. The editor should have moved this to their sandbox.... Bang. (talk) 15:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete I have made a copy of the page in my sandbox i'll continue to edit and revise with more reliable information as and when we are given a more solid time scale of release. The current page can and should be removed. As i said before i created it anticipating information to come out to confirm these rumours, i was wrong. quickstream2003 (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.