Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeWorko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Non-notable, and purely promotional. Speedy would have been appropriate.  DGG ( talk ) 21:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

GeWorko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability. Only sources are a pedia entry, 1 press release and a blog entry. SPA created article, connected with Personal Composite Instrument and IFC Markets, all promoting the same new invention. Even assuming this is a viable financial instrument, the article would need 3rd party sources for notability and verification. Content is mostly redundant with the PCI article. No significant coverage found via Google. GermanJoe (talk) 10:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. No extensive coverage. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   13:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Note that previous versions of this article named "GeWorko Method" were speedy deleted twice before, created by the same account. See: User_talk:Sergey_Kamenshchikov (I don't know if it is possible to link to the actual deleted articles.) I suspect COI, but in any case that doesn't matter because there are no reliable sources for this topic that I can find. There is one brokerage house, but I have no idea if it is linked to Geworko: . All of the other information I find is on sites run by Geworko. I got zero hits in WSJ, Financial Times and NYT. Most Google hits come from PR Web. LaMona (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.