Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gears of war 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Gears of war 2

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

It should not be deleted. This article is based on factual information which is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A9l8e7n (talk • contribs) 2007/04/10 22:56:40
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

- 	Can't get to discussion page; so I will say this here. Gears of War 2 should not be deleted because it has been said by the creators that the game was being made. Therefore this article is about a upcoming game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.9.116 (talk • contribs) and moved comment
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until there is news from a reliable source about the game it is not true. Most of the page only talks about marketing strategies not about the game itself. DBZROCKS 11:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If it has been announced then source it properly. Right now, it is definitely crystal looking. What is the rush to create the article, it's not like we have a deadline or anything. Let's wait a few months until something definitive is shown or released, then we can start the article. There is no prize for being the first to create a Gears of War 2 article. -- Cy ru s    An dir on  13:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.   ffm  ✎ talk   13:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, while it is true that a sequel will be made, we have no information when it will be available, any content, or even if its in the works, or any info. Without any confirmed info, the article, its pure speculation, which makes it suited for deletion. --  soum  (0_o) 13:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 16:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or cite some specific sources. WP is not a crystal ball. --Dariusk 19:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Along with the previous posts, I recommend finding some reputable sources to confirm information about the game. If you can source it well and provide information, then I will vote Keep, but until then, I vote Delete. -- s u m n j i m  talk with me·changes 20:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject has not been shown to fulfill the notability guideline. There does not seem to be enough verifiable information to sustain a separate Gears of War 2 page at this time. Any credible, verifiable information would probably best belong in Gears of War for now. Dancter 21:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Then provide some sources. -- s u m n j i m  talk with me·changes 23:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete In the immortal words of Jim Jones: BAAAALLIIIIN'!!! ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §   Contributions ♣ 23:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * However, despite the fact that the original game has sold more than 3 million copies to date, Microsoft Game Studios has made no official announcement regarding a Gears of War sequel Taken from Here -- s u m n j i m  talk with me·changes 00:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if a at least a credible rumor is found. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Credible" rumor? That sounds like an oxymoron to me, especially with video games. ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §   Contributions ♣ 01:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Even if the game was rumored to come out, this article is riddled with bollocks and original research.  Leebo  T / C 13:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.