Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee Willickers!

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:21, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Gee Willickers!
Delete. Non-encyclopedic. Feco 00:31, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Already moved to sub-entry under Gee in Wiktionary. delete. Also, could someone instruct me as to proper transwikification? I can't understand transwiki. thanks. DDerby 00:52, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * It's not terribly complicated, just labour-intensive.
 * The transwikied article's talk page must include the original article's edit history (for preference, properly marked up).
 * The transwiki logs at both the source and destination projects must record the move.
 * But I note that you haven't actually transwikied anything. You've just made a redlink in gee.  I'm half sure that that's enough.  There's pretty much nothing to salvage from this article &mdash; no etymology, no usage notes, no citations &mdash; that makes transwikification worth doing.  Let the redlink at Wiktionary turn blue naturally.  Similarly, the only thing to merge into List of euphemisms is the article's actual title, which appears to be a (common) mis-spelling in any case.  Redirect, at most. Uncle G 17:02, 2005 Apr 11 (UTC)
 * Delete Pavel Vozenilek 01:02, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic. Zzyzx11 | Talk 01:04, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of euphemisms, I guess. &mdash; RJH 03:21, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of euphemisms as RJH suggested above. --Fuzzball! (talk) 04:09, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivial, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 06:11, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, if not already done, with List of euphemisms.--Irishpunktom\talk 13:35, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Just delete. This page was created as a joke: http://essentiallyunremarkable.blogspot.com/2005/04/to-understand-recursion-you-must-first.html


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.