Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeekSpeak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. seresin | wasn't he just...? 04:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

GeekSpeak

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable local radio show/web content. Searches yield Technobabble. Prod contested without rationale. Jfire (talk) 16:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep If its currently being broadcast on NPR and has been since 1998, then I think that could be considered an assertion of notability. Needs a rewrite though, reads like a promo. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 17:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If it were broadcast nationally it would be, but it appears to be only local NPR affiliates. Jfire (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep but needs a re-write maybe its the best thing to delete the page and start over with this one.Thright (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep with improvement. It has been around for a while, and I'm sure notability can be established.  It's just a matter of someone improving the article. Celarnor (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been tagged as needing to establish notability since May 2007, and nobody has stepped up. Jfire (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems promising, don't see the problem of having a local radio show featured, though it seems to bug the nominator. Should also mention that it ties in a few different tech personalities from different tech companies and fields.  As the article states, it's a big presence in its niche field.  I could see how the uninformed reader doing a google search might interpret the results as technobabble.  My understanding of the results is that most of them talk about the term "Geek Speak" as well as a few podcasts.  Seems good enough to me.  69.143.226.129 (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - I've heard of the show before, and have downloaded it. So I'm not against the show. However... this article is little more than a promotional piece right now, and has no outside sources asserting the notability of the show. And I can't see how a weekly techie radio show/podcast would become notable enough for an article on Wikipedia - unless it were something like Off the Hook, notable because of its host and its association with the notable 2600 magazine. So, fails WP:RS, no sources, and not even any assertion of notability beyond the standard promo-piece peacocking. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.