Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeekWire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

GeekWire

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Sawada Katsuo (talk) 07:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Nominator has been blocked for spamming. I am not closing this nomination so that it can be evaluated on its merits (or lack thereof) - just because they are a spammer doesn't mean they're wrong. MER-C 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking at, I think it obvious that GeekWire is a routinely cited source. I was surprised to not find it on WP:RSP. If this is not closed procedurally, which I recommend given the behavior of the nominator in AfD'ing a lot of media articles, it likely should be kept. Jclemens (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Local technology news outlet that does get quoted and reprinted in other, more established sources (e.g. The Seattle Times) and has independent coverage. Definitely meets notability guidelines, even if the article is need of improvement (see Deletion is not cleanup).  Sounder Bruce  07:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.