Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geek Unit

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 07:40, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Geek Unit
Delete. Non-notable vanity. Wikibofh 21:10, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; non-notable, 0 google results. Jaxl | talk 01:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, just some guys. -- Etacar11   01:04, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable club. ManoaChild 01:39, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep We aren't notable, not yet. But we're getting there. We have a group that has increased by dozens in the months since our inception. We thought it was somewhat worth noting given the success we've had creating a safe, secure environment for country/suburb "geeks" amongst a much larger group of inner-city/ghetto "thugs". And maybe a touch of vanity (because we rock). Ninja2001 08:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete When you become notable, you can get an article. Wikipedia does not have room for every group that "isnt notable yet but will be" Allegrorondo 13:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * We do have room. We just don't wanna. Wikipedia is not for advertising. JRM · Talk 13:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a trashcan, which is exactly where this article should go.   ral  315  14:38, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Ouch. Although, Allegrorondo has an excellent point. I take that as a delete vote, JRM? Ninja2001
 * That was just a drive-by comment on Allegrorondo's remark, not a vote. But, yes, reading the article and reviewing the evidence, I'll have to say delete. I prefer not voting on notability, but I don't have to in this case: this article is not independently verifiable. It's a cute article, but it's not encyclopedic. Consider Everything2. JRM · Talk 23:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per allegrorondo Dottore So 22:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.