Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geethaiyin Raadhai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:26, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Geethaiyin Raadhai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the unremarkable movie does not qualify WP:NFO thanks  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:56, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:56, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Yes, this does not meet WP:NFO, the article's "sources" also consist of a description on a movie buying website, an opinion piece on a blog, a description and review on a movie review forum, and a spottily page. any expansion of this would violate WP:OR.Grapefruit17 (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet any of the five criteria of WP:NFO - refs given in the article are sketchy (IMDB, Spotify) - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 02:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.