Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geir Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was move to User:Geir Smith and invite him to use talk pages. -- RHaworth 19:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Geir Smith
A mix of Vanity and text that belong on a discussion page. Delete or move to proppet discussion page. Oyvind 09:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Geir wrote :

Well, the Jonang article has been corrected and they put my (site's)name in on it. I'm righting that here with this Geir Smith page.

I've retrieved the uncorrected page from "Changes" and kept it for refrence on my site.

I insist on the truth being said and not letting frauds write false things at "Jonang".

I'm prefectly knowledgeable about Jonang and the people on the other side have "agendas". They're not reliable sources at all.

Oyvind. PS. How do you fit in at Wiki ? Some post ? G.
 * Delete obviously. Dottore So 11:14, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Most of the Buddhist-speak is unintelligible to people outside that grouping. --MacRusgail 14:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The only thing resembling a claim to notability is "Geir Smith is the lineal successor of Taranatha, that is banned in Tibet, and forbidden to study by Tibetans. Geir Smith is the only person in the world, to thus have studied Taranatha in depth". This is is both unverifiable and, as MacRusgail says, entirely unintelligible to most of us. As such, I'm calling this is a vanity bio of a non-notable subject, and have tagged it tagged for speedy deletion. TheMadBaron 14:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi, The Jonang page has a case of vandalism carried out against me. They put in corrections, with my site's name quoted. Now I wanted to make the page here, so as to make it out that the page they vandalised is being used to plagiarize me. And this for the reason that I've been writing on Internet, using the Jonang page as reference, to prove something that is typically Buddhist-speak, which is "the Kalachakra is Sakyapa". Maybe I could write about the vandalism on the Geir Smith page, and about the fact that that vandalism is caused by my speaking about that page on Internet.... and the vivid controversy around it.

The debate concerns the Dalaï-Lama school of the Gelugpas, that want to have this school of Jonang, kept banned, while people like me want to get it's 500-year ban lifted. By making the ban hold, they want to suppress my school from it's freedom of speech and expressing itself. Their agenda is to utterly gag me by vandalizing the source that I use, of Jonang-Wikipedia. (But I've safeguarded the uncorrected, previous version thanks to Wiki's service of that) Maybe you can tell me what the best manner of presenting it is because I'm thinking about correcting the page tonight (French time.). I could present myself as the person making this whole page and topic, go crazy, because big interests, like the big school around the Dalaï, want to guard it's power and interests. I know this all sounds sectarian and like that, but you must all know that there is no Paradise-Lost... and there are these very down-to-earth human problems in any human entreprise, be it political, religious or other. Thanks for your times and considerations. Hope this can still find some checking for better form and content. You're sure tough bosses. Ha ha ha ! That's good too, for sure.... Geir SmithGeiremann 19:09, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.