Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geitodoris bacalladoi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per SK #1, The nomination does not advance a valid argument for deletion (see WP:DEL-REASON for some examples of what constitutes valid deletion rationales). "Not useful" in the nomination is entirely subjective. Furthermore, the nomination is incorrect in stating that the article had "no information" at the time of nomination: per this diff page, information and a source was present prior to the nomination for deletion, although there were several empty sections. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 05:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Geitodoris bacalladoi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not useful. No information. Shangmeister (talk) 01:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 21.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is more or less established that species are inherently notable. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 05:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed, the Wikipedia convention is that species are considered notable. I've added their location found and a reference for it to the article. Mark viking (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep : all species are notable. Most of these articles are started as a stub like this one, but are later expanded (and this may take some years, as we are working systematically with a bot, checking every family and genus, one by one). JoJan (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.