Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geliyoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Rationale of nominator is without basis in policy. Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Geliyoo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page is already live on Turkish Wikipedia and the links are in Turkish on English Wikipedia. It does not match the notability criteria. Yucksy (talk) 12:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Wikipedia is not a site for conflict of interest. Yucksy asked for the page to be deleted. However, you cannot delete a company, institution or organization that has been the subject of many independent sources. I think there is a conflict of interest in this work. The page must remain. It does not violate the Wikipedia rules. It seems that the Turkish page has remained stable since 2013. Considering that a Turkish company has an English page and has a stable version, THE PAGE SHOULD ABSOLUTELY STAY. Do not delete the page. It also reinforces the notion that  Yucksy is doing this job for profit, right after the news of the company executive comes out. The page has existed for years, and a few days after the news came out,  Yucksy requested to be deleted. CyberBlockchain (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the reason given to delete is vague at best, the nominator doesn't really say why it doesn't meet the criteria. I think the company has been the subject of enough independent and reliable sources to warrant notability. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 17:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep In my very own findings and outcome, I will totally disagree to the article deletion suggestion, as the topic is notable enough and adequately cited to fit in English Wikipedia standardDaxhton (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.