Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gellish database


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Gellish database

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The concept of a "Gellish database", i.e. a database holding Gellish data, doesn't seem to have any notability. This long article seems to consist mostly of an essay about triplestores, and their superiority to relational databases. Yaron K. (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not finding anything better. SwisterTwister   talk  22:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Searching my university's journal database yielded four hits, all spurious. Google Scholar yielded exactly two papers, both by the author van Renssen who is cited in the article. I can't support the notion that this is notable. MisterRandomized (talk) 07:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.