Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemar Mills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Gemar Mills

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm really not seeing significant coverage for this one, beyond some one-off localised coverage, and a few other passing mentions where he is a spokesperson for a school. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigmamsg 18:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - covered by The Atlantic & Fortune.com Joaomufc (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notability is established through coverage about Mills already in the article, particularly in The Atlantic, plus coverage elsewhere, including here. Alansohn (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of reliable sources provided to indicate notability. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: A big paragraph in the article was copyvio case. I removed it and now it seems to be okay to remain on Wikipedia as references have some reliable sources. Dial911 (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.