Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemini (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter123    (spill beans)  21:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Gemini (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. I was only able to locate this biography in a secondary source. This looks like a commercial sales site, and this is a primary source interview. This biography does not appear to meet the notability criteria. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Weakish keep. The 405 is not a commercial sales site, it's a well regarded UK music site. I also found this, this, and this. Some of the coverage looks like it is based on press releases, but he seems to have made a significant enough impact. --Michig (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I don't agree that this article should be deleted as from the sources it seems to have had adequate notability Jamesrichards12345 (talk) 12:25, 3 November 2017
 * Delete does not meet the notability criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, fails to assert notability. fish &amp;karate 10:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, Huge and influential dubstep artist, 100 million+ views across soundcloud and youtube. Just because he doesn't make pop doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a wiki page. user:Dargenor 03:38, 15 November 2017 (GMT)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC) unfortunately, SoundCloud and YouTube hits don't qualify an artiste for inclusion. Per Notability (music), can he be demonstrably said to be notable under guideline 7 ("one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style")? I'm asking in good faith, as someone who doesn't pretend to know the first thing about dubstep ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Possible keep. It seems like the radio appearances would establish notability, if they can be sourced. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.