Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemstones proper use in proper hand.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 05:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Gemstones proper use in proper hand.
Violates WP:VAIN and might have had a previous AfD with result delete. Awolf002 21:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I finally succeeded in checking the old articles and they are different enough from this page to not count as precedent. WP:VAIN still applies. Sorry for any confusion. Awolf002 12:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. due to similarity to previously deleted article. per Femto --OntarioQuizzer 21:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy: It is the result of the moved userpage User:Astrobhadauria. Again. Femto 21:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * speedy delete per OntarioQuizzer └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 23:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. Ruby 04:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as I can't see a criterion for speedy deletion that this adheres to. Stifle 09:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The fact that it was a page moved directly from userspace to articlespace without modification? Andy Saunders 16:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.