Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gen:Lock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rooster Teeth. Moved out of user's draft space without permission; it's been copied back (and since there's really only one author no extra attribution is needed), so this can be converted to redirect. ansh 666 19:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Gen:Lock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Too soon. This show may very well be notable in the future, but right now, all that exists the most basic of teasers -- there isn't even a release date yet. There are no reviews, only one or two "first look" articles -- I think this article needs to be deleted until the show has actually launched and has some significant coverage in reliable sources. Iago Qnsi (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hold on. I wasnt going to do this. I was waiting for the show to come out so i can put it in. Im sorry about this. This wont happen again. Crazybob2014 (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You still made another mistake. I reverted your edit because per WP:XFD and deletion processes you cannot blank or redirect page while its AfD hasn't been closed the same way you can't remove the AfD tag –Ammarpad (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG fail WP:NFO, not yet released and author has no objection it's clearly not notable, at least for now thus WP:TOOSOON. It may be notable in the future as OP said but not yet and we don't predict what the future holds and definitely Wikipedia doesn't either WP:FUTURE Ammarpad (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Ammarpad (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ammarpad (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.